(might wanna direct it at Chris DiBona, I believe hes head of the OSS in google, hes also on TwIT a lot). So, to get to what you want why don't you do one of the following:ġ) Track down the forums to digikam or their alternatives, and make positive suggestions and other such feedback in an attempt to improve the product.Ģ) Sign up as a tester for the beta releases of one of the products in an attempt to speed up the bug fixing which will indirectly decrease time needed to find the bugs, and let devs get to new features faster.ģ) Learn the language the apps are written in and write your own program from scratch / apply to assist existing program.Ĥ) Start a petition to get the mighty google to code a native version of Picasa. and even if they do its an ineffective way of getting their attention or for them to change the app. I don't believe any of the devs for any of the manager programs read the cafe. If you've tried every available app out there and none live up to the standard you set, then well, do something about it. In all seriousness though, I don't see what your point was to posting this here in the cafe. Ok, I'll admit was mildy wrong about the debian running under wine in ubuntu, I was looking through threads quick and doing a few other things. Reading what is on their feature list for future versions and testing them out in beta releases can also help. Just providing positive feedback and dialog might go a long way in helping out. Instead, if this type of application is important to you, then become involved with the project in some way. So I don't think there needs to be another photomanagement program because there are two fully featured programs that are maturing at a nice pace. It supports multiple database backends if SQL-Lite doesn't meet your needs.It supports uploads to web galleries.Ĭheck out the digikam site for a full list of features: Digikam () Maybe I am wrong, is there an app out there that will do all this?ĭigikam does image tagging in a competent manner. Organize by directory hierarchy, keywords, or date. Quick email feature with automatic resizing. Indexing database for fast photo location with searches. For example, I like to tag every person's name in a photo, where it was taken, and any other relevant keywords. The paradigm of current apps is terrible in my opinion, as it is not scalable when there is a large variety of different tags. Things I would love to have in a linux photo management app. (Yeah I know it can be run under wine, but I really would rather run a native program). DigiKam is OK, but not great.ĭoes anyone else agree that great photo management software for linux does not exist? Something along the lines of google picasa would be excellent. Read the Picasa Google group and you would have already answered your question here. It's closed and Google isn't interested in a native port at this time. You're not going to get a native Picasa anytime soon if ever. Some of them are close, but for people who want to really work with their photos, they are all lacking in many ways. F-Spot, Picasa for linux, digiKam, Gwenview, imgSeek, GQview, and everything else I can find is simply not up to par. I just wish linux had a professional photo organization application, and I would even pay for one if it was good. What linux user would want to use wine to run a program when a native version is available, even if it's built right into the binary? Wine is great for what it is, but bottom line, it's still an indirect path to the end. On the other hand, if they would code it natively or use a cross platform development scheme, they wouldn't be stuck with having to hand tweak their code to get it to work on linux. They are forced to develop the windows app, and then make a bunch of kludged edits to make sure that it will run correctly under wine. For example, the linux version is way behind the windows version in terms of functionality, and who knows when they will actually update it. My problem with the wine version of picasa is that they are stuck in a foreign framework. If google created a native version of picasa I would be thrilled, even if it wasn't open source. The open source part is the least of my concerns. And picasa for all intents and purposes is native in its current form. Also, never in your post did you specify you needed an open source app, just native. To be fair, while it runs "under wine", you needn't have wine installed, it uses wine code to run its own binary.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |